"Tom Lynn" <thl22@cam.ac.uk> writes: >Your solution reminded me that item and setitem were two more commands >which avoid needing a recursion as well as member and .setbf which I >mentioned in my last posting. Are there any others? I don't think that's the main point. The key is that using an array instead of a list make ITEM and SETITEM constant-time operations instead of O(N) ones. (That is, finding the 100th element of an array takes no longer than finding the first element, which is not true for lists whether it's a primitive or an interpreted procedure doing the work.) --------------------------------------------------------------- Please post messages to the Logo forum to logo-l@gsn.org. Mail questions about the list administration to logofdn@gsn.org. To unsubscribe send unsubscribe logo-l to majordomo@gsn.org.
Global SchoolNet Foundation -
Linking Kids Around the World!
Copyright GSN - All Rights Reserved
- Comments
& Questions
Visit GSN's
Global
Schoolhouse for more exciting learning resources!
Search our Site
-
Home