On 27-Jun-97, George Mills wrote: > I worked in Pascal for about 6 years and loved it. Egad! I took a course in Pascal in college, and I loathed it. Pascal is a fascist language. During the same time period I taught myself C, and have been using it ever since. Of course, C has become a fascist language too, ever since the ANSI committee mucked it all up. They added nonsense like stronger type checking and prototypes. Given a choice, I would code in Amiga E, which is far more readable than C and enjoys polymorphic datatypes. Not to mention OOP, LISP cells, a blazing fast compile-and-link cycle, and other advances. Unfortunately, I keep getting trapped into projects that require C. > Switching from > any language your used to can be painful. But after learning several > you will begin to see each languages strength and weakness. After learning a second programming language, it gets easier to pick up new ones. > Both Logo and Pascal have many Strengths and Weaknesses. I am not aware of any strengths of Pascal. > All I'm saying is to keep an open mind and don't look at strict > type checking as problem but as a benefit. How could it possibly be a benefit? >Modula-2 is a follow on to Pascal. And Oberon is a follow-on to Modula-2. >Borlands Delphi is an Object Oriented Pascal which does incremental >compiles on the fly. Object-oriented Pascal is a strange idea. If you're going to add OOP, surely it should be added to Modula-2 or Oberon. (Or does Oberon already include OOP?) -- Tony Belding http://hamilton.htcomp.net/tbelding/ --------------------------------------------------------------- Please post messages to the Logo forum to logo-l@gsn.org. Mail questions about the list administration to logofdn@gsn.org. To unsubscribe send unsubscribe logo-l to majordomo@gsn.org.
Global SchoolNet Foundation -
Linking Kids Around the World!
Copyright GSN - All Rights Reserved
- Comments
& Questions
Visit GSN's
Global
Schoolhouse for more exciting learning resources!
Search our Site
-
Home