Re: LOGO-L> crossmap

[fajoy@uio.satnet.net]

> Given that I don't have strong feelings, my inclination is not to
> change things, so as not to create incompatibilities with past versions
> and documentation.  One possible compromise would be to add a new
> procedure with a different name that takes three inputs by default.
> 
> Do other people have opinions on this?

I'm not sure about this but doesn't this all come from APL notions? 
What does APL syntax (paralleled to LOGO syntax) suggests?
---------------------------------------------------------------
Please post messages to the Logo forum to logo-l@gsn.org.  Mail
questions about the list administration to logofdn@gsn.org.  To
unsubscribe send    unsubscribe logo-l    to majordomo@gsn.org.