Re: Re: LOGO-L> Re: more thoughts on punctuation

["Dreyfuss Pierre-Andre" <p.a.dreyfuss@mailexcite.com>]

For me LOGO is good as it is.
The opportunity to declare vaiables as getter is usefull only in the case of translating
mathematical expressions into LOGO. It is easier without colon.



>> Add this to the library [...]
>
>The trouble with using actual Logo procedures to represent the
>variables is that you lose the scope of local variables.  This
>idea would work fine for globals, though.
>
>One reason I've never been too worried about the special-formness
>of TO is that there's also DEFINE, which serves the same purpose
>but follows ordinary Logo syntax rules.  But as for TO, I don't
>think it'd hurt anything to make the colons optional, or even
>allow quotes as an alternative, since the existing notation is
>already such a special case.

Your right for me it is just a problem for specialist or for theorical point of view
an discussion for that we can talk about without doing the things.

WEhave to accept that qwertz phenomena with the time comes in LOGO TOO.

Regards, 
P-A  DREYFUSS 


>---------------------------------------------------------------
>Please post messages to the Logo forum to logo-l@gsn.org.  Mail
>questions about the list administration to logofdn@gsn.org.  To
>unsubscribe send    unsubscribe logo-l    to majordomo@gsn.org.
>



Free web-based email, Forever, From anywhere!
http://www.mailexcite.com
---------------------------------------------------------------
Please post messages to the Logo forum to logo-l@gsn.org.  Mail
questions about the list administration to logofdn@gsn.org.  To
unsubscribe send    unsubscribe logo-l    to majordomo@gsn.org.