LOGO-L> Re: Returned mail: User unknown

[mikedoyle@cix.compulink.co.uk (Mike Doyle)]

In-Reply-To: <199802261700.RAA16687@mail.compulink.co.uk>
Charles Hixson wrote:

> Another problem is that pictographic languages are not very compact. 
> This tends to make dictionaries unreasonably large, presuming that there
> is any way to produce them.

But this is not a problem for a limited microworld.

However, I was looking rather for a justification of iconic programming or 
an argument for the alphabetic/numeric approach rather than a counter to 
pictographic programming.

Micheal O Duill

---------------------------------------------------------------
Please post messages to the Logo forum to logo-l@gsn.org.  Mail
questions about the list administration to logofdn@gsn.org.  To
unsubscribe send    unsubscribe logo-l    to majordomo@gsn.org.